You’re missing out on a lot by sticking with your historical financial management solution instead of bridging the gap with a modernized consolidation solution. Let’s get you up to speed.
FinanceFebruary 17, 2020|UpdatedJanuary 29, 2021
Historical financial management vs. CCH Tagetik: a feature-by-feature comparison for power users
As a day-to-day user of financial management systems, you’re likely sensitive to the shortcomings of the applications you use. Do any of these pains apply to you?
Common complaints include:
- Complex scripting for even basic tasks
- Lengthy variance and what-if analysis processes
- Lack of workflow across the close cycle
- Outdated UI and cumbersome integration with Microsoft Office
- Complex upgrades with no functional innovations planned
Browse All Resources
Related Insights
-
Artificial IntelligenceFinanceFebruary 18, 2025
Webinar series | The expert guide to AI adoption in Finance
CCH Tagetik AI experts explore when finance teams should adopt AI, the best AI use cases, and steps to get started. -
ArticleFinanceFebruary 14, 2025
Budgeting Software: 2025 BPM Buyers Guide for Budgeting & Planning
BPM Partners 2025 Buyers Guide for Budgeting and Planning Solutions helps companies in the market looking for a new budgeting and planning software. -
WebinarFinanceFebruary 12, 2025
CPM VS ERP: Turn data into valuable insights
Discover why predictive analytics and Corporate Performance Management (CPM) come into play, enabling a more forward-looking approach. -
ArticleFinanceFebruary 10, 2025
CCH® Tagetik expert solution from Wolters Kluwer achieves prestigious designation of Leader in the Nucleus Research CPM Technology Value Matrix 2025
This marks the fifth consecutive year Nucleus Research named CCH Tagetik® a leader in its esteemed market evaluation.