Request Information
Comparison of Meta-Aggregation and Meta-Ethnography as Qualitative Review Methods, A
- Publication Year:
- 2013
- Edition:
- 1st Ed.
- Author:
- Lockwood, Craig; Pearson, Alan
- ISBN:
- 978-1-46-985097-9
-
Description
-
Details
-
Collections
-
Also Recommended
Description
Explores qualitative synthesis and the implications of particular approaches on the findings of qualitative reviews and compares and contrasts the methods used in qualitative research.
Analyzing qualitative research can be done if the right methodology is utilized. Meta-ethnography is grounded in primary research traditions from the social sciences. It is an approach used to generate new theoretical knowledge related to sociological interests and generate new theoretical frameworks rather than aggregate knowledge. Meta-aggregation is a method of systematic review that mirrors the processes of a quantitative review while holding to the traditions and requirements of qualitative research.
Analyzing qualitative research can be done if the right methodology is utilized. Meta-ethnography is grounded in primary research traditions from the social sciences. It is an approach used to generate new theoretical knowledge related to sociological interests and generate new theoretical frameworks rather than aggregate knowledge. Meta-aggregation is a method of systematic review that mirrors the processes of a quantitative review while holding to the traditions and requirements of qualitative research.
Details
- Platform:
- OvidSP
- Product Type:
- Book
- Author:
- Lockwood, Craig; Pearson, Alan
- ISBN:
- 978-1-46-985097-9
- Specialty:
-
- Research & Theory
- Language:
- English
- Edition:
- 1st Ed.
- Pages:
- 63
- Publication Year:
- 2013
- CAN-Implement©: Planning for Best-Practice Implementation
- Clinical Wisdom and Evidence-Based Healthcare
- Critically Appraising Evidence for Healthcare
- Guideline Adaptation: Conducting Systematic, Exhaustive, and Reproducible Searches
- Historical Emergence of Qualitative Synthesis, The
- Implementing Evidence Using an Action Research Framework
- International Collaboration in Translational Health Science
- JBI PACES
- JBI SUMARI
- Knowledge Translation in Healthcare
- Mixed Methods Approach to Evidence Synthesis, A
- Public Engagement in Translating Knowledge to Action
- Stakeholder Engagement: The Role of Tacit Knowledge and Value Statements in Translation Science
- Statistics for Systematic Review Authors
- Synthesis of Prevalence and Incidence Data, The
- Synthesizing Descriptive Evidence
- Synthesizing Economic Evidence
- Synthesizing Evidence from Narrative, Text and Opinion
- Synthesizing Evidence of Diagnostic Accuracy
- Synthesizing Evidence of Harm
- Synthesizing Evidence of Risk
- Synthesizing Qualitative Evidence
- Synthesizing Quantitative Evidence
- Translation Science and the JBI Model of Evidence-Based Healthcare
- Turning Knowledge into Action: Practical Guidance on How to Do Integrated Knowledge Translation Research