ComplianceESGApril 17, 2025

Enhancing Safety Through Integrated Incident Investigation Methods

Accident investigation is a critical component of risk management, particularly in industries where major accidents can have severe consequences. Thorough investigations help prevent future incidents, thereby reducing economic, reputational, and safety impacts on businesses.

Over the years, various methods have been developed for accident investigation, each with unique applications, strengths, and limitations. This study by Snorre Sklet compares several widely recognized methods, providing insights into their effectiveness and areas of application, as well as their strengths and weaknesses.

By combining these methods, risk managers can obtain a comprehensive overview of the events studied, facilitating learning and the implementation of changes. Utilizing modern software such as Enablon's EHS and BowTieXP Enterprise solutions can significantly enhance your incident management process.

Comparing methods

Method

Detail

 Accident Evolution and Barrier Function (AEB) Method  
  • Advantage: Models the evolution towards an incident as interactions between human and technical systems and integrates human and technical systems in the analysis.
  • Disadvantage: May be complex to implement and requires specialist or expert knowledge.
 Acci-Map 
  •  Advantage: Considers multiple levels of decision-making in risk management and provides a comprehensive view of the socio-technical system involved in the accident.
  • Disadvantage: May be complex to implement and requires specialist or expert knowledge.
 Barrier Analysis
  • Advantage: Identifies hazards and barriers that should have prevented the accident and evaluates the performance of barriers.
  • Disadvantage: Focuses mainly on physical and management barriers, potentially overlooking other factors.
 Change Analysis
  • Advantage: Examines changes that caused undesired outcomes and helps identify deviations from expected operations.
  • Disadvantage: Limited to analyzing differences between accident-free and accident scenarios.

 Events and Causal Factors Charting (ECFC) 

  • Advantage: Provides a graphical display of the accident's chronology, helps in organizing evidence and portraying the sequence of events and facilitates communication among investigators.
  • Disadvantages: May not effectively illustrate complex relationships between events.
 Event Tree Analysis
  • Advantage: Analyzes event sequences following an initiating event and illustrates the influence of barriers on event sequences.
  • Disadvantage: Primarily a proactive risk analysis method, not always suitable for post-accident analysis. 
 Fault Tree Analysis
  • Advantage: Breaks down an accident into root causes using logic gates. It can be both qualitative and quantitative.
  • Disadvantage: Requires expertise to use effectively and may not capture all possible causes.
 Influence diagram
  • Advantage: Analyzes the hierarchy of root causes, including management decisions and human errors and provides a visual representation of dependencies among events.
  • Disadvantage: Can be complex and require specialist knowledge.
 Man, Technology, and Organisation (MTO) Analysis
  • Advantage: Focuses equally on human, organizational, and technical factors and uses structured analysis, change analysis, and barrier analysis.
  • Disadvantage: Requires specialist or expert knowledge.
 Management and Oversight Risk Tree (MORT)
  • Advantage: Provides a systematic method for comprehensive accident investigation and focuses on control factors and management system deficiencies.
  • Disadvantage: Requires expert knowledge to use effectively.
 Root Cause Analysis
  • Advantage: Identifies underlying deficiencies in safety management systems and provides a systematic process to determine root causes.
  • Disadvantage: Requires significant judgment and a comprehensive list of causal factors.
 Sequential Timed Events Plotting (STEP) 
  • Advantage: Proposes a systematic process based on multi-linear sequences of events and provides a comprehensive, multi-linear description of the accident process.
  • Disadvantage: May be complex to implement without proper training.
 Systematic Cause Analysis Technique (SCAT)
  • Advantage: Supports occupational incident investigation and uses a checklist to ensure all facets of an accident are examined.
  • Disadvantage: May require specialist knowledge for effective use.
 Tripod Beta
  • Advantage: Focuses on organizational failures as main factors in accident causation and provides a tree-like overview of the accident.
  • Disadvantage: May be complex to implement and requires specialist or expert knowledge.
Read this research paper in more detail: Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation by Snorre Sklet

The Enablon Vision Platform, through its EHS and BowTieXP Enterprise solutions, offers advanced capabilities to enhance traditional accident investigation methods. This integrated platform provides a comprehensive suite for incident management, including reporting, investigation, and corrective actions. It ensures a seamless transition from reporting to investigation, integrating data from various sources to provide a holistic view of incidents, advanced analytics, and customizable reports.
Accident investigation is a vital process for improving safety and preventing future incidents. By understanding the strengths and limitations of various methods and leveraging modern tools like Vision Platform and BowTieXP Enterprise, organizations can enhance their incident management practices and foster a safer working.
Request Online Demo
Back To Top