Kleos
FinanceESGSeptember 04, 2024

The ultimate guide to carbon emissions reporting: what CFOs need to know about Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions

In this article, we’ll explore the GHG protocol, the complexities surrounding carbon emissions data, and the importance of GHG metrics, considering evolving frameworks and regulations like the CSRD and IFRS. 

The demand for a greener, more sustainable, and ethical world is only intensifying. And as it does, decarbonization become a global priority.

To achieve the Paris Agreement’s goal of limiting the temperature increase to 1.5-degree above pre-industrial levels and meet the UN’s goal of net zero by 2050, a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030 is needed. As a result, investors now consider decarbonization a critical determinant, calling on organizations to disclose carbon emissions and their plans to reduce them.

The thing is, measuring greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is highly complex, both in terms of data gathering and producing the necessary emissions calculations. 

In this article, we’ll explore the GHG protocol, the complexities surrounding carbon emissions data, and the importance of GHG metrics, considering evolving frameworks and regulations like the CSRD and IFRS. 

What you’ll learn:

- Carbon emissions disclosure explained: The GHG Protocol and Scope 1, 2 & 3 emissions 
- Why CFOs should prioritize carbon emissions disclosure
- Challenges of disclosing carbon emissions
- How CCH Tagetik supports carbon emissions disclosure

Carbon emissions disclosure explained: The GHG Protocol and Scope 1, 2 & 3 emissions 

The GHG protocol is the greenhouse gas accounting standard most widely used by companies. It provides businesses and governments with standards, guidelines, tools, and training to help measure the greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming. It’s also known as “carbon accounting” because it provides a standardized framework for measuring and reporting greenhouse gas emissions, similar to how financial accounting involves measuring and reporting financial transactions

Fast facts about the GHG protocol

- More than 9/10 Fortune 500 companies use the GHG protocol.

- The GHG protocol is an international protocol developed by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) and the World Resources Institute (WRI). It was developed with input from organizations and experts across more than 40 countries, making it one of the most globally collaborative environmental standards.

- The GHG protocol has been in use for over 20 years.

- Beyond businesses and governments, the GHG Protocol has been used by cities, universities, and even sports teams to measure and reduce their carbon footprints.

- The GHG protocol identifies six main greenhouse gases:

  • Carbon dioxide (CO2)
  • Methane (CH4)
  • Nitrous oxide (N2O)
  • Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
  • Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)
  • Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)

- By following the GHG protocol, companies are closer to aligning with the Paris Agreement’s goals. 

- The GHG Protocol has inspired the development of innovative technologies and practices aimed at reducing emissions, such as more efficient manufacturing processes and greener supply chains.

The GHG protocol has three scopes

Scope 1 emissions

Scope 1 emissions are direct emissions. Direct emissions are from sources that are owned by a company and can include:

- Emissions from fleet vehicles
- Emissions from stationary sources like incinerators, furnaces, or boilers
- Manufacturing or processing emissions
- Chemical emissions
- Fugitive emissions, like methane from coal mines or electricity from burning coal

Scope 2 emissions

Scope 2 emissions are indirect emissions. Indirect emissions are released from purchased energy, e.g., electricity, steam, heating, and cooling. The actual emission is often produced at another facility, resulting from the company’s consumption.

Scope 3 emissions

Scope 3 emissions are further indirect emissions that are outside of the organization’s control but still a result of the organization’s operations, employees, and purchases.
Scope 3 emissions are categorized as upstream and downstream and further broken down into 15 categories:

Upstream Emissions:
Purchased Goods and Services
Capital Goods
Fuel- and Energy-Related Activities (Not Included in Scope 1 or Scope 2)
Upstream Transportation and Distribution
Waste Generated in Operations
Business Travel
Employee Commuting
Upstream Leased Assets 
Downstream Emissions:
Downstream Transportation and Distribution
Processing of Sold Products
Use of Sold Products
End-of-Life Treatment of Sold Products
Downstream Leased Assets
Franchises
Investments 

 

There are seven standards under the GHG Protocol, four of which apply to companies and organizations: 


Corporate accounting reporting standard:
Guidance for businesses disclosing emissions.

Project protocol: Guidance for measuring reductions from mitigation projects

Corporate value chain standard: Guidance for measuring and reporting Scope 3 emissions from the entire value chain, including both upstream and downstream activities.

Product standard: Guidance for businesses evaluating emissions from a product’s lifecycle

CCH Tagetik ESG & Sustainability Performance Management

Get compliant. Build trust. Drive a more sustainable future.

Why CFOs should prioritize carbon emissions disclosure

The GHG protocol was established to help organizations identify areas with the highest levels of emissions so that they can take action to set reduction targets and decarbonize their operations. 

External stakeholders, like regulators, financing bodies, investors, and consumers, increasingly reference carbon emissions KPIs to understand a company’s efforts to reduce its environmental impact. Carbon emissions performance, therefore, influences a company’s ability to get financing, secure investments, and sell products. 

In sum, here are three reasons why carbon emissions disclosure should be high on the CFO’s agenda:

1. To satisfy investor demand

As ESG considerations become integral to investment decisions, investors increasingly seek transparency and reliable carbon emissions data to assess companies' long-term sustainability. 

A Morgan Stanley report found that 77% of investors are interested in funds that produce financial returns and positive social/environmental impact. Over half will increase their sustainable investments in the next 12 months. 

2. To adhere to the regulatory landscape 

Evolving frameworks and regulations, such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) S1 and S2, emphasize the need for robust carbon emissions disclosure and encourage companies to adopt standardized reporting practices. 

Unlike other standards, CSRD and IFRS S1 and S2 focus on materiality, requiring organizations to report on the financial implications of ESG factors on the company and how a company’s operations impact the world. 

3. To preserve an organization’s reputation

Reputation plays a critical role in determining a value — with some executives attributing 63% of their company’s market value to reputation. Transparent reporting on carbon emissions demonstrates a company's commitment to sustainability, enhancing its reputation and fostering stronger relationships with stakeholders. 

Challenges of disclosing carbon emissions

The GHG protocol serves an essential purpose, but collecting and measuring carbon emissions data is time-consuming and resource-intensive for many organizations. 

Carbon emissions data can live in various systems across a business, divided by line of business, department, and subsidiary. Carbon emissions data might be external to the organization, adding another layer of complexity, communication, and systematization. Further, carbon emissions data might be limited, requiring investigation and sourcing.

The challenges of carbon emissions disclosures can be summed up as follows:

Data availability issues
Carbon emissions data involve many stakeholders and complex value chains. Gathering the data from systems, stakeholders, and complex organizational structures is a wide-reaching task. 

Data quality and consistency
Ensuring the reliability and consistency of data from various sources can be challenging, especially when dealing with international operations and subsidiaries.

Complex value chains
Scope 3 emissions, often the most significant contributor to a company's carbon footprint, present significant measurement challenges as they extend to variables beyond a company's direct control. It can be exceedingly difficult to precisely track the emissions made from a single staff member’s commute, let alone 500 FTEs with different commutes, vehicles, or modes of transportation. 

Multiple calculation methodologies 
The GHG protocol provides various calculation methods based on the source of emissions, the type, and the granularity of the data available.  Scope 3 in particular can be calculated according to many methods, including spend-based, average data, supplier-specific, and more. 

CCH Tagetik supports carbon emissions disclosure

To help companies report on and reduce carbon emissions, CCH Tagetik ESG & Sustainability for Carbon Emissions supports organizations in their quest to disclose according to the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).

Our carbon emissions module includes:

  • A library of emissions factors
  • Seamless data integration with any carbon data source
  • Pre-configured GHG protocol-aligned calculations for scope 1, 2, and 3
  • Emissions target setting and monitoring
  • Emissions KPI dashboards

Learn how CCH Tagetik Sustainability Performance Management for Carbon Emissions will enable you to prepare accurate carbon emission data for all ESG reporting, including CSRD and IFRS S1 and S1.

valentina-francesconi
Project Manager - CCH Tagetik

Valentina has more than 6 years of experience in CPM solutions, she has a strong background on financial institutions industries, with a specific focus on Solvency II and IFRS17 implementations.

She is now responsible for the development of the ESG & Sustainability Performance Management for Insurance and corporate industries.

Back To Top